More special tags for controlling Watchtower?

mnot
mnot
Community Member

It's possible to remove an item from the 'Two-Factor Authentication' list in Watchtower by adding a 2FA tag to the item. This is really useful, because some 2FA methods aren't visible to 1pw.

Similarly, it would be super-useful to have special tags to control other aspects of watchtower. For example, some passwords are required to be weak, like SIM PINs for phones. It'd be nice to suppress them from being listed as weak passwords, so that genuinely weak passwords (for the context they're used in) are more visible. This could be done with a special tag, something like weak-ok.

Likewise for unsecured websites; for example, many local-network and localhost services are unsecured. While that isn't great, it's the current state of the art, because getting a certificate for them is difficult.


1Password Version: Not Provided
Extension Version: Not Provided
OS Version: Not Provided
Sync Type: Not Provided

Comments

  • ag_ana
    ag_ana
    1Password Alumni
    edited May 2021

    Hi @mnot!

    Likewise for unsecured websites; for example, many local-network and localhost services are unsecured. While that isn't great, it's the current state of the art, because getting a certificate for them is difficult.

    For these you can already use the http tag ;)

    For others, I know our developers are considering ways to do this in the future, ideally without even requiring tags :+1: I have let them know that you would also find this useful.

    ref: dev/projects/customer-feature-requests#130

  • mnot
    mnot
    Community Member

    Cool, thanks!

  • mnot
    mnot
    Community Member

    (oh, and is the http tag documented?)

  • ag_ana
    ag_ana
    1Password Alumni

    You are welcome @mnot!

    (oh, and is the http tag documented?)

    None of these are documented as far as I know. I think they are supposed to be temporary workarounds until we find a way to do this that does not require tags in the first place ;)

  • This content has been removed.
This discussion has been closed.