Feature Request: Support for other Masked Email providers
I would guess that there's probably a decent overlap of 1Password and ProtonMail customers. This year ProtonMail acquired https://simplelogin.io for masked email creation (https://simplelogin.io/blog/simplelogin-join-proton/) and I'm wondering how it could be made available in the same way as
Masked Email - Keep your real email address private. Automatically create new, random email addresses you can use when signing up to services online. Any emails from those services get sent right to your primary inbox. If you start receiving spam, you can block that address with a single click.
https://support.1password.com/fastmail/
1Password Version: Not Provided
Extension Version: Not Provided
OS Version: Not Provided
Browser:_ Not Provided
Referrer: forum-search:masked email
Comments
-
When will AB add AnonAddy integration to 1Password v8? I don't want to pay 50 usd + tax for fastmail just to use the email masking option.
1Password Version: Not Provided
Extension Version: Not Provided
OS Version: Not Provided0 -
AnonAddy does seem to offer an API (unlike Apple, which is also request a few times): https://app.anonaddy.com/docs/
0 -
Yeah, that why i ask AB for this option, because Apple does not provide api access.
0 -
+1
0 -
AnonAddy and SimpeLogin support would be great additions.
0 -
Commenting to add my +1 for Fastmail alternatives integration (AnonAddy and SimpleLogin in particular). Bitwarden has made creating email aliases really easy with their recent integrations of AA, SL, Firefox Relay, and soon Fastmail. Would be great if 1Password could implement that as well.
0 -
I would love to see an integration of AnonAddy and SimpleLogin as well. Fastmail is a nice service but if used only for masked email it is kind of overkill, both finance and functionality wise.
0 -
I was just reminded of this feature by a post I saw on Reddit - please add me and my family members (four users total) as wanting integration with AnonAddy and/or SimpleLogin. I personally am more invested in AnonAddy, but I use SimpleLogin as well and would welcome integration with either.
0 -
+1 for additional email masking service integrations.
0 -
Also, a +1 for me Annonaddy support would be amazing!
0 -
Across all providers 1Password needs a way to allow the user to specify the username portion of the masked email address when we use a custom domain that we own. For example, banking.787@mydomain.com. Right now masked emails are nearly useless to me as they are randomly generated, which is great for a domain you don't own, but needed for custom domains.
0 -
+1 for me to integrate Annonaddy
0 -
+1 for SimpleLogin
0 -
+1
0 -
Across all providers 1Password needs a way to allow the user to specify the username portion of the masked email address when we use a custom domain that we own. For example, banking.787@mydomain.com.
Wouldn’t that be way less random?
0 -
I don't WANT random masked email usernames.
Looks like I don’t understand: if they are no longer random, what’s still masked?
0 -
Hello everyone, I’d like to add my +1 for the AnonAddy and SimpeLogin support feature request.
0 -
+1
I just upgraded to v8 after getting the EOL notice popup in v7, and discovered masked mail.
I would have expected protonmail to be at the very top of the list when agilebits looked for an initial email provider to pilot this feature with, but was sadly disappointed.As someone else noted, there is indeed an overlap between 1password and protonmail customers. Agilebits seeks to offer the best password management solution out there, and has garnered a good reputation. Protonmail is your counterpart in that regard for secure and private email.
I can understand why you went with fastmail initially, since they have some thoughts about distinguishing themselves, and made a slight bet on privacy. However, please consider protonmail as your second provider, since that service is really the gold standard in terms of private and secure email (as much as a hosted one can be) where-as fastmail with its server-side unencrypted processing (and FISA court subjection) is far from being that.
0