Signing back into the Community for the first time? You'll need to reset your password to access your account. Find out more.
Forum Discussion
Memory usage in 1Password for Safari
This discussion was created from comments split from: Electron.
Thanks for the post - I understand the reasons for trying to simplify, but when it hurts the user experience like this does, then perhaps you need to reconsider? Like the only advantage I can see for doing this is simplified development for your team, and being able to roll out new features faster. From a customer perspective its almost entirely bad, more system usage, more energy usage - I just truly can't understand why you'd let down your loyal users like this.
Whatever way you cut it, the new browser extension is objectively worse than the previous dependent version, for those with a 1P desktop App. It only improves things for those without 1P Desktop App. For those with the Desktop App it is a step backwards.
Given performance is going backwards, and features are being stripped out (local vaults etc) will you adjust the subscription prices down to compensate? From a customer experience perspective perhaps it would make this regression more palatable.
